| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
1. Old Guard Weighs in on Battleships flaws - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Matt Faithbringer wrote: Bronson Hughes wrote: Logi? No hulls. ehm, nestor anybody? ( -í~ -£-û -í-¦)
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.11 13:00:09
|
2. Domnix - Missile Hardpoints - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Heck no. Less R(L/H)ML cancer - the better. Train for an Armageddon, mkay.
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.11 12:58:11
|
3. Old Guard Weighs in on Battleships flaws - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Demerius Xenocratus wrote: I wouldn't pay 500M for a ship that's less effective in combat than a HAC costing half that. Ah, well you see - it is T3s current performance that is driving the demand, and consequently, the price. As baltec1 me...
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.09 12:08:40
|
4. More Purple - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Stitch Kaneland wrote: Purple engine trails.. http://i.imgur.com/sg9AtQv.jpg Can't remember where I found this gem.
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.08 17:09:46
|
5. Old Guard Weighs in on Battleships flaws - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Maradusa Macarthy wrote: baltec1 wrote: Maradusa Macarthy wrote: ewww, I hope not. That would make them totally worthless. Tech 3 is suppose to be better than Tech 2, no? Or else CCP should change their names to T2 Strategic Cruisers an...
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.08 16:55:09
|
6. Sentry Drones - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Gardes> Curators > Bouncers > Wardens.
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.08 16:05:42
|
7. Old Guard Weighs in on Battleships flaws - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Maradusa Macarthy wrote: Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote: T3Destroyers are actually not as cancerous as they used to be - The non-Defensive mode resist profile is worse than that of T2 equivalents, and I would have given them only 1 Rig slot. The...
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.08 14:05:43
|
8. Old Guard Weighs in on Battleships flaws - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
T3Destroyers are actually not as cancerous as they used to be - The non-Defensive mode resist profile is worse than that of T2 equivalents, and I would have given them only 1 Rig slot. The Augmented Plating sub-systems along with T2 resist prof...
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.08 11:16:43
|
9. Guristas 0.0 ratting Vindicator? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
TP in place of the second TC, and Aux Pump swapped for the Trimark one. For a shield setup, a Large or even a Medium Deadspace booster, perhaps with an Amp, should suffice, freeing up rig slots for something else.
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.08 10:54:40
|
10. More Purple - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Tiddle Jr wrote: All officer gears should be in purple shades. Purple stasis webifier, gosh i like it! Do eeeeeeeeet.
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.08 10:52:18
|
11. Old Guard Weighs in on Battleships flaws - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Maradusa Macarthy wrote: Trinkets friend wrote: Some people use rail tengu doctrines (aside from Slippery Petes) and i just can't see the benefit vs Eagles. People will be dumb no matter what. eg; Rail Eagle = Rail tengu (n...
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.08 10:48:11
|
12. Old Guard Weighs in on Battleships flaws - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Trinkets friend wrote: Some people use rail tengu doctrines (aside from Slippery Petes) and i just can't see the benefit vs Eagles. People will be dumb no matter what. eg; Rail Eagle = Rail tengu (no-Pete) +/- 5% on DPs and tank and costs doubl...
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.07 20:03:22
|
13. Sticky:[Aegis] More balance! - Ishtars, DDAs and the Tempest - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Bronson Hughes wrote: Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote: http://i.imgur.com/afJycoE.png?1 Some people are just oblivious. What's telling is that whoever made that chart didn't eve bother with missiles.... Possibly because CCP forgot to include...
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.07 10:09:48
|
14. Rainbows! Ponies! GUI needs colour! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Andreus Ixiris wrote: I always struggle to find the market icon. Always . The financial chart looks good, but some contrast in the form of contrasting colour is in order. Likewise for the -Z- ISK symbol.
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.07 04:17:46
|
15. Are we not able to use old icons anymore? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=393625&find=unread
Show your support for a colourful Neocom! In my opinion, this is a devolution - http://i.imgur.com/04VVcpJ.png
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.06 10:17:52
|
16. MARAUDERS!!! - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Lan Wang, they work excellently. Until they don't. Find yourself in a situation with a t2 Logi, or even a few proper kiters and it's game over when cap boosters run out.
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.06 10:13:00
|
17. officer cloaks on supers. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Chainsaw Plankton is correct - it is mostly locking time.
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.06 10:10:22
|
18. Old Guard Weighs in on Battleships flaws - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Want to buff battleships? Nerf T3s savagely. Exactly. Even though the Augmented Plating sub-systems were reduced from 10% to 7.5%, they are still broken due to the exact T2 resist profile on T3 hulls, not to mention THREE rig...
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.06 10:03:20
|
19. Anger management - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Brothels? But the Door is still closed.
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.06 09:53:03
|
20. Sticky:[Aegis] More balance! - Ishtars, DDAs and the Tempest - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
http://i.imgur.com/afJycoE.png?1
Some people are just oblivious.
- by Iroquoiss Pliskin - at 2015.07.06 09:42:42
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |